Murdoch University Research Repository

Welcome to the Murdoch University Research Repository

The Murdoch University Research Repository is an open access digital collection of research
created by Murdoch University staff, researchers and postgraduate students.

Learn more

Comparison of walking protocols and gait assessment systems for machine learning-based classification of Parkinson’s disease

Rehman, R.Z.U., Del Din, S., Shi, J.Q., Galna, B.ORCID: 0000-0002-5890-1894, Lord, S., Yarnall, A.J., Guan, Y. and Rochester, L. (2019) Comparison of walking protocols and gait assessment systems for machine learning-based classification of Parkinson’s disease. Sensors, 19 (24). Article 5363.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview
Free to read: https://doi.org/10.3390/s19245363
*No subscription required

Abstract

Early diagnosis of Parkinson’s diseases (PD) is challenging; applying machine learning (ML) models to gait characteristics may support the classification process. Comparing performance of ML models used in various studies can be problematic due to different walking protocols and gait assessment systems. The objective of this study was to compare the impact of walking protocols and gait assessment systems on the performance of a support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF) for classification of PD. 93 PD and 103 controls performed two walking protocols at their normal pace: (i) four times along a 10 m walkway (intermittent walk-IW), (ii) walking for 2 minutes on a 25 m oval circuit (continuous walk-CW). 14 gait characteristics were extracted from two different systems (an instrumented walkway—GAITRite; and an accelerometer attached at the lower back—Axivity). SVM and RF were trained on normalized data (accounting for step velocity, gender, age and BMI) and evaluated using 10-fold cross validation with area under the curve (AUC). Overall performance was higher for both systems during CW compared to IW. SVM performed better than RF. With SVM, during CW Axivity significantly outperformed GAITRite (AUC: 87.83 ± 7.81% vs. 80.49 ± 9.85%); during IW systems performed similarly. These findings suggest that choice of testing protocol and sensing system may have a direct impact on ML PD classification results and highlight the need for standardization for wide scale implementation.

Item Type: Journal Article
Publisher: MDPI
Copyright: © 2019 by the authors
URI: http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/62685
Item Control Page Item Control Page

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year