Murdoch University Research Repository

Welcome to the Murdoch University Research Repository

The Murdoch University Research Repository is an open access digital collection of research
created by Murdoch University staff, researchers and postgraduate students.

Learn more

Alzheimer’s disease cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers are not influenced by gravity drip or aspiration extraction methodology

Rembach, A., Evered, L.A., Li, Q-X, Nash, T., Vidaurre, L., Fowler, C.J., Pertile, K.K., Rumble, R.L., Trounson, B.O., Maher, S., Mooney, F., Farrow, M., Taddei, K., Rainey-Smith, S., Laws, S.M., Macaulay, S.L., Wilson, W., Darby, D.G., Martins, R.N., Ames, D., Collins, S., Silbert, B., Masters, C.L. and Doecke, J.D. (2015) Alzheimer’s disease cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers are not influenced by gravity drip or aspiration extraction methodology. Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, 7 (1). Art. 71.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Download (823kB) | Preview
Free to read: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-015-0157-7
*No subscription required

Abstract

Introduction: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, although of established utility in the diagnostic evaluation of Alzheimer's disease (AD), are known to be sensitive to variation based on pre-analytical sample processing. We assessed whether gravity droplet collection versus syringe aspiration was another factor influencing CSF biomarker analyte concentrations and reproducibility.

Methods: Standardized lumbar puncture using small calibre atraumatic spinal needles and CSF collection using gravity fed collection followed by syringe aspirated extraction was performed in a sample of elderly individuals participating in a large long-term observational research trial. Analyte assay concentrations were compared.

Results: For the 44 total paired samples of gravity collection and aspiration, reproducibility was high for biomarker CSF analyte assay concentrations (concordance correlation [95%CI]: beta-amyloid1-42 (Aβ42) 0.83 [0.71 - 0.90]), t-tau 0.99 [0.98 - 0.99], and phosphorylated tau (p-tau) 0.82 [95 % CI 0.71 - 0.89]) and Bonferroni corrected paired sample t-tests showed no significant differences (group means (SD): Aβ42 366.5 (86.8) vs 354.3 (82.6), p = 0.10; t-tau 83.9 (46.6) vs 84.7 (47.4) p = 0.49; p-tau 43.5 (22.8) vs 40.0 (17.7), p = 0.05). The mean duration of collection was 10.9 minutes for gravity collection and <1 minute for aspiration.

Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that aspiration of CSF is comparable to gravity droplet collection for AD biomarker analyses but could considerably accelerate throughput and improve the procedural tolerability for assessment of CSF biomarkers.

Item Type: Journal Article
Publisher: Biomed Central
Copyright: © 2015 The Authors.
URI: http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/60847
Item Control Page Item Control Page

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year