Murdoch University Research Repository

Welcome to the Murdoch University Research Repository

The Murdoch University Research Repository is an open access digital collection of research
created by Murdoch University staff, researchers and postgraduate students.

Learn more

Should Google Scholar be used for benchmarking against the professoriate in education?

Merga, M.K., Mat Roni, S. and Mason, S.ORCID: 0000-0002-8999-4448 (2020) Should Google Scholar be used for benchmarking against the professoriate in education? Scientometrics .

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Download (589kB) | Preview
Free to read: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03691-3
*No subscription required

Abstract

In the neoliberal environment of contemporary academia, an individual’s research rankings and outputs can shape their career security and progression. When applying for ongoing employment and promotional opportunities, academics may benchmark their performance against that of superior colleagues to demonstrate their performance in relation to their discipline. The H-index and citation rates are commonly used to quantify the value of an academic’s work, and they can be used comparatively for benchmarking purposes. The focus of this paper is to critically consider if Google Scholar be used for benchmarking against the professoriate in education, by weighting up issues of data reliability and participation. The Google Scholar profiles of full professors at top ranked universities in Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States of America are analysed to explore how widespread Google Scholar use is in the education professoriate. Quartiles of impact are established in relation to H-index, with exploration of how gender is distributed across these quartiles. Limitations of using Google Scholar data are highlighted through a taxonomy of quality confounders, and the utility of Google Scholar as a legitimate tool for benchmarking against the professoriate in education is strongly challenged. As metrics continue to rise in their importance for academics’ job security and promotional prospects, reliance on metrics of dubious quality and uneven participation must be questioned.

Item Type: Journal Article
Murdoch Affiliation: Education
Publisher: Springer Verlag
Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s).
URI: http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/58256
Item Control Page Item Control Page

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year