Murdoch University Research Repository

Welcome to the Murdoch University Research Repository

The Murdoch University Research Repository is an open access digital collection of research
created by Murdoch University staff, researchers and postgraduate students.

Learn more

Identifying young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in linked administrative data: A comparison of methods

McNamara, B.J., Jones, J., Shepherd, C.C.J., Gubhaju, L., Joshy, G., McAullay, D., Preen, D.B., Jorm, L. and Eades, S.J. (2020) Identifying young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in linked administrative data: A comparison of methods. International Journal of Population Data Science, 5 (1).

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Download (504kB) | Preview
Free to read: https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v5i1.1100
*No subscription required

Abstract

Background

In the ongoing debate on optimum methods for identification of Indigenous people within linked administrative data, few studies have examined the impacts of method on population counts and outcomes in family-based linkage studies of Aboriginal children.

Objective

To quantify differences between three validated algorithms in ascertaining Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in linked administrative data.

Methods

Linked administrative health data for children born in WA from 2000-2013, were used to examine the cohorts identified by three methods: A) the Indigenous Status Flag (ISF, derived by the WA Data Linkage Branch using a multistage-median approach) for the children alone; B) the ISF of the children, their parents and grandparents; and C) Indigenous status of the child, mother or father on either of the child’s perinatal records (Midwives or birth registration), to determine differing characteristics of each cohort.

Results

Method B established a larger cohort (33,697) than Method C (33,510) and Method A (27,482), with all methods identifying a core group of 26,993 children (80-98%). Compared with children identified by Method A, additional children identified by Methods B or C, were from less-disadvantaged and more urban areas, and had better perinatal outcomes (e.g. lower proportions of small-for-gestational age, 10% vs 16%). Differences in demographics and health outcomes between Methods C and B were minimal.

Conclusions

Demographic and perinatal health characteristics differ by Indigenous identification method. Using perinatal records or the ISF of parents and grandparents (in addition to the ISF of the child) appear to be more inclusive methods for identifying young Indigenous children in administrative datasets.

Item Type: Journal Article
Murdoch Affiliation: Ngangk Yira Research Centre
Publisher: Swansea University. Prifysgol Abertawe
Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s).
URI: http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/57732
Item Control Page Item Control Page

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year