Murdoch University Research Repository

Welcome to the Murdoch University Research Repository

The Murdoch University Research Repository is an open access digital collection of research
created by Murdoch University staff, researchers and postgraduate students.

Learn more

Reshaping HDR supervisor writing advice through unpacking Discourses

Velautham, L. and Picard, M.ORCID: 0000-0002-3087-7407 (2010) Reshaping HDR supervisor writing advice through unpacking Discourses. In: 33rd HERDSA Annual International Conference, 6 - 9 July 2010, Melbourne, Australia

[img]
Preview

Abstract

This paper aims to enhance supervisor writing advice and its uptake by research candidates through unpacking supervisors’ written comments and candidates’ perceptions of these comments. Effective commentary on research writing requires that supervisors and candidates have a mutual understanding of tasks, their responsibilities, standards and initiatives (Cargill & Cadman, 2005) and that the research candidates are able to “feed- forward” this understanding into future tasks as part of a self-management strategy (Rae & Cochrane, 2008). In this paper, we contend that a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) unpacking of supervisor comments can benefit all parties in the supervision relationship, particularly in the case of English as an Additional Language (EAL) candidates. Supervisors’ awareness of their implicit pedagogies and their role in the supervisory relationship can transform praxis (Janks, 2005). Additionally, candidate understanding of what supervisors mean by ‘good writing’ and the categories by which they judge ‘good writing’, along with the institutional, disciplinary and individual relations that underlie these categories, can empower them as research writers and as participants in the supervisory relationship (Cadman & Cargill, 2007). This research involves an analysis of supervisor comments on eleven research proposals according to Fairclough’s (2003) steps of CDA. The supervisor comments are categorised according to the types of feedback (discourse) they contain as well as the social and ideological relationships (Discourse) they reveal. Then the research candidates’ experience of the comments are analysed. Finally, pedagogical implications aimed at enhancing the supervisory relationship are discussed.

Item Type: Conference Paper
Conference Website: http://www.herdsa.org.au/publications/conference-p...
Other Information: Published in Research and Development in Higher Education: Reshaping Higher Education Vol. 33 July, 2010, 654 pages Published by M. Devlin, J. Nagy and A. Lichtenberg ISBN: 0908557809
URI: http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/56434
Item Control Page Item Control Page

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year