Monitoring the athlete match response: Can external load variables predict Post-match acute and residual fatigue in soccer? A systematic review with Meta-analysis

Hader, K., Rumpf, M.C., Hertzog, M., Kilduff, L.P., Girard, O. and Silva, J.R. (2019) Monitoring the athlete match response: Can external load variables predict Post-match acute and residual fatigue in soccer? A systematic review with Meta-analysis. Sports Medicine - Open, 5 (1).

Abstract

Background
Monitoring athletes’ external load during a soccer match may be useful to predict post-match acute and residual fatigue. This estimation would allow individual adjustments to training programs to minimize injury risk, improve well-being, and restore players’ physical performance and inform the recovery process.

Methods
Using a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature, the aim is to determine which monitoring variables would be the strongest predictors of acute (immediately) and residual (up to 72 h) fatigue states in soccer. PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases were searched (until September 2018). Studies concurrently examining soccer match-related external load metrics and subjective and/or objective measures were selected to determine pooled correlations (r¯¯) with confidence intervals (CI). The quality and strength of the findings of each study were evaluated to identify overall levels of evidence.

Results
Eleven studies were included (n = 165 athletes). Acute (r¯¯= 0.67; 95% CI = [0.40, 0.94]) and residual (24 h post-match, r¯¯= 0.54; 95% CI = [0.35, 0.65]) changes in muscle damage markers and countermovement jump peak power output (CMJPPO) were, with moderate to strong evidence, largely correlated with running distance above 5.5 m s−1. No other external load metric was largely correlated with both biochemical and neuromuscular markers. For every 100-m run above 5.5 m·s−1, CK activity measured 24 h post-match increased by 30% and CMJPPO decreased by 0.5%. Conversely, the total distance covered did not present any evidence of a clear relationship with any fatigue-related marker at any time-point.

Conclusions
Running distance above 5.5 m·s−1 represents the most sensitive monitoring variable characterizing biochemical and neuromuscular responses, at least when assessed during the initial 24 h (not at 48 h/72 h) post-match recovery period. In addition, total distance covered is not sensitive enough to inform decision-making during the fatigue monitoring process.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Murdoch Affiliation(s):	Murdoch Applied Sports Science Laboratory
Publisher:	Springer Open
United Nations SDGs:	Goal 3: Good Health and Well-Being
URI:	http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/54057

Item Control Page

Downloads