Murdoch University Research Repository

Welcome to the Murdoch University Research Repository

The Murdoch University Research Repository is an open access digital collection of research
created by Murdoch University staff, researchers and postgraduate students.

Learn more

Neuromuscular adaptations to low-load blood flow restricted resistance training

Cook, S.B., Scott, B.R.ORCID: 0000-0002-2484-4019, Hayes, K.L. and Murphy, B.G. (2018) Neuromuscular adaptations to low-load blood flow restricted resistance training. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 17 (1). pp. 66-73.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Download (274kB) | Preview
Free to read: https://www.jssm.org/hf.php?id=jssm-17-66.xml
*No subscription required

Abstract

Low-load blood flow restricted (BFR) resistance exercise has been suggested to be as effective as moderate and high-load resistance training for increasing muscle size and strength. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of 6 weeks of HL or low-load BFR resistance training on neuromuscular function, strength, and hypertrophy of the knee extensors. Eighteen participants aged 18-22 years old were randomized to one of three training groups: moderate load (ML: 70% of 1 repetition maximum [1-RM]); BFR (20% 1-RM with a vascular restriction set to ~180 mmHg); and a control group (CON) that did not exercise. Participants performed leg extension (LE) and leg press exercises 3 times per week for 6 weeks. Measurements of isometric torque, LE 1-RM, central activation, electrically evoked torque, and muscle volume of the knee extensors were obtained before and after training. Isometric peak torque did not change following the training (p = 0.13). LE 1-RM improved in the ML (34 ± 20%; d = 0.78) and BFR (14 ± 5%; d = 0.67) groups compared to the CON group (0.6 ± 8%; d = 0.09; time x group interaction p = 0.02). Muscle volume increased in the ML (5.6%; d = 0.19) and BFR groups (2.5%; d = 0.09) with no change in the CON group (time x group interaction p = 0.001). There were no changes in central activation and evoked torque in any groups following the training (p > 0.05). Strength and hypertrophy were evident following ML and BFR resistance training programs indicating that both modal-ities are effective, although ML training appears to be a more potent and efficient. Neuromuscular changes were not evident and warrant more research.

Item Type: Journal Article
Murdoch Affiliation: School of Psychology and Exercise Science
Publisher: Journal of Sport Science and Medicine
Copyright: © Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
URI: http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/47300
Item Control Page Item Control Page

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year