Reexamining the Relationship Between Thinking Styles and Transformational Leadership: What Is the Contribution of Imagination and Emotionality?
Curtis, G.J., King, G. and Russ, A. (2017) Reexamining the Relationship Between Thinking Styles and Transformational Leadership: What Is the Contribution of Imagination and Emotionality? Journal of Leadership Studies, 11 (2). pp. 8-21.
*Subscription may be required
Abstract
Several recent studies have found relationships between individual differences in information-processing styles, as conceptualized in cognitive-experiential theory (CET), and aspects of leadership style and leadership behavior. In these studies, two thinking-style variables, rational thinking and behavioral coping, have consistently correlated positively with transformational leadership, a style of leadership in which leaders favorably transform followers’ attitudes and behaviors toward their work. However, expected relationships between CET’s experiential thinking system and transformational leadership have been elusive. In Study 1, school leaders’ (N = 70) thinking and leadership styles were examined using a new scale that measures experiential thinking more thoroughly than it has been in previous studies by splitting experiential thinking into intuition, imaginative thinking, and emotionality. In Study 1, rational thinking, behavioral coping, and imaginative thinking all correlated positively and significantly with transformational leadership. These results were replicated in Study 2 with the broader leadership sample (N = 93). These results suggest that effective leadership may be fostered by developing leaders’ capacity for imaginative thinking.
Item Type: | Journal Article |
---|---|
Murdoch Affiliation(s): | School of Psychology and Exercise Science |
Publisher: | John Wiley and Sons Ltd |
Copyright: | © 2017 University of Phoenix |
URI: | http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/38907 |
![]() |
Item Control Page |