Threatened or Threatening? How Ideology Shapes Asylum Seekers’ Immigration Policy Attitudes in Israel and Australia
Canetti, D., Snider, K.L.G., Pedersen, A. and Hall, B.J. (2016) Threatened or Threatening? How Ideology Shapes Asylum Seekers’ Immigration Policy Attitudes in Israel and Australia. Journal of Refugee Studies, 29 (4). pp. 583-606.
*Subscription may be required
*No subscription required
Abstract
Can different political ideologies explain policy preferences regarding asylum seekers? We focus on attitudes regarding governmental policy towards out-group members and suggest that perceptions of threat help to shape these policy attitudes. Study 1 compared public opinion regarding asylum policy in Israel (N = 137) and Australia (N = 138), two countries with restrictive asylum policies and who host a large number of asylum seekers; Study 2, a longitudinal study, was conducted during two different time periods in Israel—before and during the Gaza conflict. Results of both studies showed that threat perceptions of out-group members drive the relationship between conservative political ideologies and support for exclusionary asylum policies among citizens. Perceptions of threat held by members of the host country (the in-group) towards asylum seekers (the out-group) may influence policy formation. The effect of these out-groups threats needs to be critically weighed when considering Israeli and Australian policies towards asylum seekers.
Item Type: | Journal Article |
---|---|
Murdoch Affiliation(s): | School of Psychology and Exercise Science |
Publisher: | Oxford University Press |
Copyright: | © 2016 The Authors |
URI: | http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/35954 |
![]() |
Item Control Page |