Conviction and punishment: Free press and competitive election as deterrents to corruption
Tools
Tools
Tian, X. and Lo, V.I. (2009) Conviction and punishment: Free press and competitive election as deterrents to corruption. Public Management Review, 11 (2). pp. 155-172.
*Subscription may be required
Abstract
Democratic institutions are not equally effective in curbing corruption. Using a criminal behavior model, this study formulates the hypothesis that corruption offenders, being risk-inclined, are deterred more by conviction-reinforcing democratic institutions than by punishment-reinforcing democratic institutions. Evidence based on cross-country regressions strongly supports this hypothesis, indicating that compared with competitive election, free press is a more effective deterrent to corruption. While shedding light on why corruption remains rampant in some electoral democracies – particularly the illiberal democracies – this study identifies a key to corruption control.
| Item Type: | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Publisher: | Taylor & Francis |
| Copyright: | © 2009 Taylor & Francis |
| URI: | http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/33084 |
 |
Item Control Page |
