Murdoch University Research Repository

Welcome to the Murdoch University Research Repository

The Murdoch University Research Repository is an open access digital collection of research
created by Murdoch University staff, researchers and postgraduate students.

Learn more

Manual and manipulative therapy in addition to rehabilitation for osteoarthritis of the knee: Assessor-Blind randomized pilot trial

Dwyer, L., Parkin-Smith, G.F., Brantingham, J.W., Korporaal, C., Cassa, T.K., Globe, G., Bonnefin, D. and Tong, V. (2015) Manual and manipulative therapy in addition to rehabilitation for osteoarthritis of the knee: Assessor-Blind randomized pilot trial. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 38 (1). 1-21.e2.

Link to Published Version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.10.002
*Subscription may be required

Abstract

Objectives
The purpose of this study was to examine the methodological integrity, sample size requirements, and short-term preliminary clinical outcomes of manual and manipulative therapy (MMT) in addition to a rehabilitation program for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods
This was a pilot study of an assessor-blinded, randomized, parallel-group trial in 2 independent university-based outpatient clinics. Participants with knee OA were randomized to 3 groups: 6 MMT sessions alone, training in rehabilitation followed by a home rehabilitation program alone, or MMT plus the same rehabilitation program, respectively. Six MMT treatment sessions (provided by a chiropractic intern under supervision or by an experienced chiropractor) were provided to participants over the 4-week treatment period. The primary outcome was a description of the research methodology and sample size estimation for a confirmatory study. The secondary outcome was the short-term preliminary clinical outcomes. Data were collected at baseline and 5 weeks using the Western Ontario and McMasters Osteoarthritis Index questionnaire, goniometry for knee flexion/extension, and the McMaster Overall Therapy Effectiveness inventory. Analysis of variance was used to compare differences between groups.

Results
Eighty-three patients were randomly allocated to 1 of the 3 groups (27, 28, and 28, respectively). Despite 5 dropouts, the data from 78 participants were available for analysis with 10% of scores missing. A minimum of 462 patients is required for a confirmatory 3-arm trial including the respective interventions, accounting for cluster effects and a 20% dropout rate. Statistically significant and clinically meaningful changes in scores from baseline to week 5 were found for all groups for the Western Ontario and McMasters Osteoarthritis Index (P ≤ .008), with a greater change in scores for MMT and MMT plus rehabilitation. Between-group comparison did not reveal statistically significant differences between group scores at week 5 for any of the outcome measures (P ≥ .46).

Conclusions
This pilot trial suggests that a confirmatory trial is feasible. There were significant changes in scores from baseline to week 5 across all groups, suggesting that all 3 treatment approaches may be of benefit to patients with mild-to-moderate knee OA, justifying a confirmatory trial to compare these interventions.

Item Type: Journal Article
Murdoch Affiliation: School of Health Professions
Publisher: Mosby Inc.
Copyright: © 2015 National University of Health Science
URI: http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/24867
Item Control Page Item Control Page