Droplet combustion in presence of airstream oscillation: Mechanisms of enhancement and hysteresis of burning rate in microgravity at elevated pressure
Jangi, M. and Kobayashi, H. (2010) Droplet combustion in presence of airstream oscillation: Mechanisms of enhancement and hysteresis of burning rate in microgravity at elevated pressure. Combustion and Flame, 157 (1). pp. 91-105.
*Subscription may be required
The enhancement and hysteresis behavior of the burning rate of single droplet combustion in the presence of airstream oscillation observed in previously performed microgravity experiments at elevated pressure up to 1.0 MPa were numerically investigated. Excellent agreement with the experimental results was obtained and the mechanisms of these phenomena were examined based on precise numerical data on instantaneous droplet diameter variations corresponding to the unsteady airstream velocity, flow fields around the droplet, and flame movement during combustion. Results show that, depending on the oscillation Reynolds number, which is a function of pressure, flow amplitude and droplet diameter, there are three mechanisms involved in the enhancement of burning rate. In the cases of low oscillation Reynolds numbers, a diffusion-time-delay has a significant effect on the flame front movement and thus, on heat from the flame to the droplet. In the cases of high oscillation Reynolds numbers, a vortex generated outside the droplet flame promotes the motion of the flame, especially in the wake region, and thus enhancing the droplet burning rate. In addition to these two mechanisms, the forced convection during the acceleration period of the flow oscillation causes overshooting of the droplet burning rate due to instantaneous imbalances of the airflow momentum with the Stefan flow. These three mechanisms explain the predominant role of the highest velocity of the oscillatory airstream in determination of the mean burning rate constant and droplet lifetime. Results also show that the hysteresis behavior of the burning rate is a consequence of the different responses of the flame to the deceleration period compared with the responses to the acceleration period under the existence of those three mechanisms.
|Publication Type:||Journal Article|
|Copyright:||© 2009 The Combustion Institute.|
|Item Control Page|