Catalog Home Page

Diablogging about asylum seekers: Building a counter-hegemonic discourse

Fozdar, F. and Pedersen, A. (2013) Diablogging about asylum seekers: Building a counter-hegemonic discourse. Discourse & Communication, 7 (4). pp. 1-18.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Authors' Version
Download (338kB)
Link to Published Version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1750481313494497
*Subscription may be required

Abstract

New technologies provide new forums for the expression and challenging of racism. This article explores the potential of an interactive blog about asylum-seekers to serve as part of the Habermasian ‘public sphere’, facilitating debate between those with opposing views. We offer evidence that pro-and anti-asylum seeker arguments made in blogs construct a binary between those in favour and those against. Arguments are collectively constructed producing relatively coherent discourses, despite being articulated by different individuals. We then explore the ways in which pro-asylum seeker postings utilize strategies which social scientists have identified as effective in challenging racism. As such, the blog is a site where what has come to be called ‘bystander anti-racism’ is being practised, producing a counter-hegemonic discourse. Our evidence suggests that despite arguments to the contrary, blogs are potentially useful sites for the development of communicative consciousness in relation to race issues, particularly the challenging of racism.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Murdoch Affiliation: School of Psychology and Exercise Science
Publisher: Sage
Copyright: The Authors
URI: http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/16729
Item Control Page Item Control Page

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year