Clarifying the point: A brief response to Sharrock and Coulter
Tools
Tools
Tools
McHoul, A. and Rapley, M. (2006) Clarifying the point: A brief response to Sharrock and Coulter. Theory & Psychology, 16 (2). pp. 277-279.
![[img]](http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
| PDF - Authors' Version Download (159kB) | Preview |
Link to Published Version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959354306062539
*Subscription may be required
*Subscription may be required
Abstract
This is a short response to a particular point made by our colleagues Wes Sharrock and Jeff Coulter in their otherwise convincing and devastating critique of the ‘Theory of Mind’ (ToM) avatar of cognitivism. We think they may have misunderstood what we once said about the use of ‘mental predicates’ and wish to clarify the point in question.
| Publication Type: | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Murdoch Affiliation: | School of Media, Communication and Culture |
| Publisher: | SAGE Publications |
| Copyright: | 2006 SAGE |
| URI: | http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/9921 |
| Item Control Page |
