Zoo‐logics: Questions of analysis in a film by Peter Greenaway
Wills, D. and McHoul, A. (1991) Zoo‐logics: Questions of analysis in a film by Peter Greenaway. Textual Practice, 5 (1). pp. 8-24.
*Subscription may be required
The forms of text that we might call, for want of a better word, postmodern, are not familiar to us. We can immediately call to mind Joyce, the nouveau roman, so-called metafiction, Pynchon, De Lillo and so on. And we can argue about the applicability of those examples with respect to a category that means little for us anyway. Then we can imagine or invoke forms of analysis that have been applied inter alia to those texts; for example, the Barthesian, the Genettian, the Derridean, etc. They are not mysteries. But such analyses, more and more, are treating the texts they treat not just as objects for analysis in general. The tendency starts to some extent with Genette, but becomes most explicit in the work of Kristeva, Barthes, and of course Derrida. All that has been oft-repeated. And of course, it did not require a category like 'postmodern fiction' to elicit such inquiries into analysis; rather they are part and parcel of analysis itself, to the extent that any analysis is required to establish its own terms, whether or not it acknowledges such a task as an exercise in self-reflexivity.
|Publication Type:||Journal Article|
|Murdoch Affiliation:||School of Humanities|
|Publisher:||Routledge as part of Taylor & Francis|
|Copyright:||1991 Taylor & Francis|
|Item Control Page|