Issues raised by Ruthrof’s ’Meaning: An intersemiotic perspective’
King, D. (1997) Issues raised by Ruthrof’s ’Meaning: An intersemiotic perspective’. Semiotica, 115 (3-4). pp. 391-396.
|PDF - Published Version |
Download (181kB) | Preview
*Subscription may be required
In 'Meaning: An intersemiotic perspective', Ruthrof argues that the entirety of human experience can be construed in terms of sign systems. Following Peirce, who maintains that we think only in signs, he says:
... reality is the result of the corroboration of one system by at least one other sign system. Or, more simply, reality occurs when signs from different significatory systems support one another. (Ruthrof 1995: 25)
In my opinion, Ruthrof's theory of sign systems is highly persuasive. There are, however, ethical considerations arising from it that I think need discussing. If what I have to say in the following is cogent, we shall find ourselves faced with a choice: either reject Ruthrof's theory of signs, or profoundly revise our attitudes with regard to art. Given the persuasiveness of Ruthrof's theory, I shall be urging the latter.
|Publication Type:||Journal Article|
|Publisher:||Walter de Gruyter|
|Copyright:||© Walter de Gruyter|
|Item Control Page|