Round table: Common sense in environmental impact assessment: it is not as common as it should be(with responses and a riposte)
Ross, W.A., Morrison-Saunders, A., Marshall, R., Sánchez, L.E., Weston, J., Au, E., Morgan, R.K., Fuggle, R. and Sadler, B. (2006) Round table: Common sense in environmental impact assessment: it is not as common as it should be(with responses and a riposte). Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 24 (1). pp. 20-22.
|PDF - Published Version |
Download (34kB) | Preview
*Subscription may be required
Reviews of environmental impact assessment (EIA) practice, particularly by industrial proponents, have highlighted common shortfalls. EIA would benefit from more `common sense', which is not very common. For example, issue scoping usually includes too many inconsequential factors, and issues not directly affecting project decisions. Consideration of significance is often vague, misleading or inconsistent. Quality of environmental impact statements (EISs) leaves much to be desired, with EIS documents of little use to stakeholders. EIA guidance is a possible solution but is not always focused or applied sensibly. While we suggest more effective signals from government EIA regulators to project proponents to overcome these difficulties, our primary intention is to evoke discussion and provoke practitioners to take up the fight to improve the quality and integrity of EIAs.
|Publication Type:||Journal Article|
|Murdoch Affiliation:||School of Environmental Science|
|Publisher:||Beech Tree Publishing|
|Copyright:||© IAIA 2006|
|Item Control Page|